Case was no way a publicity stunt
WHILE I agree with Miss Playfoot's ideals of chastity before marriage, I find myself rather weary of the case made against Millais Secondary School concerning Miss Playfoot wearing her silver ring to school.
She is perfectly correct in her assessment of the situation; Christians' rights seem to be tucked into a small box in the large vat of our politically correct culture, and although I admire her boldness in presenting this challenge in such a riveting case, I truly believe Millais has made a sensible and fair point.
Jewellery that is not a universal symbol of faith should not be worn in schools. This applies to everyone, whether Muslim, Sikh, Christian or Hindu.
Yes, we are individuals who deserve the right to assert our own independence, but the idea of school uniform seems to suggest that all differences should be put aside. By wearing uniform we are creating ourselves in one, unified body.
I do not mean that our sense of identity should disappear, and I am certainly not suggesting that people should not clearly and outwardly demonstrate their faith, though let us do it by our actions if symbolic jewellery is not allowed.
This case has been an easy one to follow. After debating and arguing with myself for the last two weeks, I have honestly come to the conclusion that this case was in no way a publicity stunt, I believe it was one girl fighting for a cause she truly believed in.
So, I congratulate you, Miss Playfoot, on going that far to raise awareness for a cause you are right about. Christianity in this country may be losing its rights and voice amongst the hustle and bustle of political correctness.
The full article contains 291 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
-
Last Updated:
02 August 2007 12:32 PM
-
Source:
n/a
-
Location:
Horsham