Following Roger Arthur’s recent letter (WSCT Sept 3 ‘Inspector must tackle key issues’, ) I read with interest the comments by readers on your website where the West of Ifield site was raised again.
A member of the public wrote ‘why on earth should Horsham be taking Crawley’s housing shortfall when there is a perfectly suitable site right there on the edge of Crawley?’
And another wrote ‘...this entire debacle is the result of Horsham and Crawley dumping houses where they are neither needed nor wanted for the sole purpose of protecting Ifield Golf Club. This will be highlighted if and when the Judicial Review is allowed to go ahead’.
So why is there such sensitivity about the Ifield site? Where was the objective, detailed evaluation done on this site to exclude it when both Horsham District Council and Crawley Borough Council originally agreed that it was a suitable site?
Why was Mr Symonds, in his letter, so critical of Dr Richardson calling him ‘smart or stupid’ for questioning why the west of Ifield site had been dropped off the radar?
The High Court judge at the Judicial Review will want to test whether there has been a legal process behind this and other decisions.
New Moorhead Drive, Horsham
Don’t miss out on all the latest breaking news where you live.
Here are four ways you can be sure you’ll be among the first to know what’s going on.
1 Make our website your homepage at www.wscountytimes.co.uk
2 Like our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/wscountytimes
3 Follow us on Twitter @wscountytimes
4 Register with us by clicking on ‘sign in’ (top right corner). You can then receive our daily newsletter AND add your point of view to stories that you read here.
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
The County Times – always the first with your local news.
Be part of it.