DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
  • 19/06/13
  • 14°C to 26°C Sunny spells
  • Horsham 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Thursday 20 Jun

    Light rain

    Temp

    High21°c

    Low12°c

    Wind

    From South east

    Speed10 mph

    Friday 21 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High19°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed13 mph

    Saturday 22 Jun

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low11°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed20 mph

    Sunday 23 Jun

    Light showers

    Temp

    High17°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed16 mph

    Monday 24 Jun

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High18°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed14 mph

  • Like Us
  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

‘Garden grabbing’ home approved

editorial image

editorial image

A Pulborough neighbour was left ‘gutted’ after Horsham District Council unanimously approved the development of a bungalow in an applicant’s garden.

The proposed bungalow had been resubmitted after a request was made by the Development Control South Committee to reduce the dwelling’s ridge height.

The applicant, Leonard Reineck, argued that the proposed ridge height was not out of keeping with the other properties on Steeton Rock Road.

In opposition, neighbour John Griffiths said: “The plot is on rising ground, thus the building from our point of view is higher.”

Another neighbour, Ray Wannell, claimed the proposed bungalow would be ‘visually overbearing’ and have a ‘detrimental affect’ on his privacy.

The application states that the ridge height of 6.8 meters was not an issue as other properties in the area measured up to 7 meters.

Mr Reineck added: “We understand our neighbours are against the application, but there are others in the area who are for it.”

Neighbour Mr Graham Humphries accused the applicant of ‘garden grabbing’ and suggested to reduce the proposed dwelling’s ridge height by 1 meter.

Philip Circus (Con, Chanctonbury) agreed, he said: “I’m unhappy about the height of the property. I would like to see a reduction.”

The committee said concerns with the height has been satisfactorily met by the application and development was approved with the condition that a landscape scheme must be carried out.

Mr Wannell said: “I’m gutted and disappointed.”

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page